Angola vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Angola
64.05
in 2014
Eswatini
65.8
in 2014
Angola rank
149th
Eswatini rank
147th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Angola
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 65.8 against 64.05 in Angola, a difference of 1.75.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Angola ranks 149th and Eswatini ranks 147th of 181 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.33 | 38.43 | 13.1 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 53.65 | 60.62 | 6.97 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Angola or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 65.8 against 64.05 in Angola as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Angola and Eswatini?
- 1.75, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Angola ranks 149th and Eswatini ranks 147th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.