Algeria vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Algeria
81.26
in 2014
Comoros
80.72
in 2014
Algeria rank
97th
Comoros rank
100th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Algeria
  • Comoros
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 81.26 against 80.72 in Comoros, a difference of 0.54.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.

Algeria ranks 97th and Comoros ranks 100th of 181 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Comoros Difference Ahead
2000s 57.94 76.09 18.16 Comoros
2010s 76.78 79.6 2.82 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Algeria or Comoros?
Algeria, at 81.26 against 80.72 in Comoros as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Algeria and Comoros?
0.54, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Comoros?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Algeria and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Algeria ranks 97th and Comoros ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.