Albania vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Albania
92.7
in 2014
Philippines
92.48
in 2014
Albania rank
29th
Philippines rank
32nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Albania
- Philippines
How they compare
Albania currently reports 92.7 against 92.48 in Philippines, a difference of 0.22.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.98 | 87.51 | 1.47 | Albania |
| 2010s | 92.37 | 94.33 | 1.97 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Albania or Philippines?
- Albania, at 92.7 against 92.48 in Philippines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Albania and Philippines?
- 0.22, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Philippines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Albania and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Albania ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.