Albania vs Palau: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Albania
92.7
in 2014
Palau
93.25
in 2014
Albania rank
29th
Palau rank
26th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Albania
  • Palau
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Palau currently reports 93.25 against 92.7 in Albania, a difference of 0.55.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 29th and Palau ranks 26th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 88.98 84.67 4.31 Albania
2010s 92.37 92.41 0.0424 Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Albania or Palau?
Palau, at 93.25 against 92.7 in Albania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Albania and Palau?
0.55, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Palau?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Albania and Palau rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Albania ranks 29th and Palau ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.