Albania vs Lithuania: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Albania
92.7
in 2014
Lithuania
92.59
in 2014
Albania rank
29th
Lithuania rank
31st

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Albania
  • Lithuania
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Albania currently reports 92.7 against 92.59 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.11.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 31st of 181 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 88.98 85.49 3.49 Albania
2010s 92.37 90.15 2.22 Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Albania or Lithuania?
Albania, at 92.7 against 92.59 in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Albania and Lithuania?
0.11, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Lithuania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Albania and Lithuania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Albania ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 31st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.