Albania vs Guyana: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Albania
92.7
in 2014
Guyana
93.03
in 2014
Albania rank
29th
Guyana rank
28th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Albania
  • Guyana
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 93.03 against 92.7 in Albania, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 29th and Guyana ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Guyana Difference Ahead
2000s 88.98 82.15 6.83 Albania
2010s 92.37 91.26 1.11 Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Albania or Guyana?
Guyana, at 93.03 against 92.7 in Albania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Albania and Guyana?
0.33, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Guyana?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Albania and Guyana rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Albania ranks 29th and Guyana ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.