Afghanistan vs Tajikistan: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Afghanistan
0
in 2014
Tajikistan
0
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
177th
Tajikistan rank
177th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Afghanistan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 against 0 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 177th and Tajikistan ranks 177th of 183 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.92 | 0 | 23.92 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 8.58 | 0.0706 | 8.51 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Afghanistan or Tajikistan?
- Afghanistan, at 0 against 0 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Afghanistan and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Tajikistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Afghanistan ranks 177th and Tajikistan ranks 177th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.