Tunisia vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Tunisia
- Zambia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 200 DB16-20 methodology against 200 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Tunisia ranks 30th and Zambia ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Tunisia or Zambia?
- Tunisia, at 200 DB16-20 methodology against 200 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Tunisia and Zambia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Tunisia and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Tunisia ranks 30th and Zambia ranks 30th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.