Solomon Islands vs United Republic of Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)

Solomon Islands
257 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
United Republic of Tanzania
275 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
20th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
18th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100200300201420162019

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 275 DB16-20 methodology against 257 DB16-20 methodology in Solomon Islands, a difference of 18 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 20th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 18th of 188 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Solomon Islands or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 275 DB16-20 methodology against 257 DB16-20 methodology in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Solomon Islands and United Republic of Tanzania?
18 DB16-20 methodology, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and United Republic of Tanzania?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Solomon Islands and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
Solomon Islands ranks 20th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs United Republic of Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/solomon-islands/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/solomon-islands/tanzania/">Solomon Islands vs United Republic of Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.