Panama vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Panama
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 62.5 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Panama, a difference of 2.5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 114th and Saint Lucia ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Panama or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 62.5 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Panama and Saint Lucia?
- 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Panama ranks 114th and Saint Lucia ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.