Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Mozambique
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 170 DB16-20 methodology against 160 DB16-20 methodology in Mozambique, a difference of 10 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 186 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Mozambique or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 170 DB16-20 methodology against 160 DB16-20 methodology in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 10 DB16-20 methodology, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Mozambique ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.