Morocco vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Morocco
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 67 DB16-20 methodology against 62.5 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Lucia, a difference of 4.5 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 109th and Saint Lucia ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Morocco or Saint Lucia?
- Morocco, at 67 DB16-20 methodology against 62.5 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Morocco and Saint Lucia?
- 4.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Morocco and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Morocco ranks 109th and Saint Lucia ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.