Malta vs Switzerland: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Malta
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 27 DB16-20 methodology against 25 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 2 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 157th and Switzerland ranks 155th of 186 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Malta or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 27 DB16-20 methodology against 25 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Malta and Switzerland?
- 2 DB16-20 methodology, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Switzerland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Switzerland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Malta ranks 157th and Switzerland ranks 155th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.