Malaysia vs Mali: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Malaysia
- Mali
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 35 DB16-20 methodology against 33.33 DB16-20 methodology in Mali, a difference of 1.67 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 149th and Mali ranks 152nd of 186 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Malaysia or Mali?
- Malaysia, at 35 DB16-20 methodology against 33.33 DB16-20 methodology in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Malaysia and Mali?
- 1.67 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mali?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Mali rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Malaysia ranks 149th and Mali ranks 152nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.