Madagascar vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Madagascar
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 118 DB16-20 methodology against 116.82 DB16-20 methodology in Madagascar, a difference of 1.18 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 64th of 188 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Madagascar or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 118 DB16-20 methodology against 116.82 DB16-20 methodology in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Madagascar and Pakistan?
- 1.18 DB16-20 methodology, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Pakistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Madagascar ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 64th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.