Lithuania vs Malta: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Lithuania
- Malta
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 28 DB16-20 methodology against 25 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 3 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 157th and Malta ranks 160th of 189 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Lithuania or Malta?
- Lithuania, at 28 DB16-20 methodology against 25 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Lithuania and Malta?
- 3 DB16-20 methodology, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Malta rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Lithuania ranks 157th and Malta ranks 160th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.