Libya vs Peru: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Libya
- Peru
How they compare
Libya currently reports 50 DB16-20 methodology against 50 DB16-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 130th and Peru ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Libya or Peru?
- Libya, at 50 DB16-20 methodology against 50 DB16-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Libya and Peru?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Peru?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Peru rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Libya ranks 130th and Peru ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.