Latvia vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Latvia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 37 DB16-20 methodology against 35 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 2 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 151st and Singapore ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Latvia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 37 DB16-20 methodology against 35 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Latvia and Singapore?
- 2 DB16-20 methodology, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Latvia ranks 151st and Singapore ranks 150th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.