Kosovo vs Libya: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Kosovo
- Libya
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 50 DB16-20 methodology against 50 DB16-20 methodology in Libya, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 131st and Libya ranks 131st of 189 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Kosovo or Libya?
- Kosovo, at 50 DB16-20 methodology against 50 DB16-20 methodology in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Kosovo and Libya?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Libya?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Libya rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Kosovo ranks 131st and Libya ranks 131st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.