South Korea vs Spain: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- South Korea
- Spain
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 11.1 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Spain, a difference of 11.1 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 165th and Spain ranks 167th of 186 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), South Korea or Spain?
- South Korea, at 11.1 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between South Korea and Spain?
- 11.1 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Spain?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Spain rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- South Korea ranks 165th and Spain ranks 167th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.