Kiribati vs Uzbekistan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Kiribati
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 310 DB16-20 methodology against 292 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 18 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Kiribati or Uzbekistan?
- Kiribati, at 310 DB16-20 methodology against 292 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Kiribati and Uzbekistan?
- 18 DB16-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Uzbekistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Kiribati ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.