Japan vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Japan
- Philippines
How they compare
Japan currently reports 54 DB16-20 methodology against 52.5 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 1.5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 127th and Philippines ranks 128th of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Japan or Philippines?
- Japan, at 54 DB16-20 methodology against 52.5 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Japan and Philippines?
- 1.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Japan ranks 127th and Philippines ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.