Guinea vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Guinea
- Mauritius
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 128.4 DB16-20 methodology against 128.12 DB16-20 methodology in Mauritius, a difference of 0.28 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 58th and Mauritius ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Guinea or Mauritius?
- Guinea, at 128.4 DB16-20 methodology against 128.12 DB16-20 methodology in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Guinea and Mauritius?
- 0.28 DB16-20 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Guinea ranks 58th and Mauritius ranks 59th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.