Guinea vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Guinea
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 138.8 DB16-20 methodology against 128.4 DB16-20 methodology in Guinea, a difference of 10.4 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 58th and Indonesia ranks 55th of 186 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Guinea or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 138.8 DB16-20 methodology against 128.4 DB16-20 methodology in Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Guinea and Indonesia?
- 10.4 DB16-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Indonesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Indonesia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Guinea ranks 58th and Indonesia ranks 55th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.