Grenada vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Grenada
- Sweden
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 40 DB16-20 methodology against 40 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 143rd and Sweden ranks 143rd of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Grenada or Sweden?
- Grenada, at 40 DB16-20 methodology against 40 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Grenada and Sweden?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Sweden rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Grenada ranks 143rd and Sweden ranks 143rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.