Finland vs New Zealand: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Finland currently reports 70 DB16-20 methodology against 67 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 3 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 108th and New Zealand ranks 110th of 189 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Finland or New Zealand?
- Finland, at 70 DB16-20 methodology against 67 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Finland and New Zealand?
- 3 DB16-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Finland ranks 108th and New Zealand ranks 110th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.