Ethiopia vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Ethiopia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 175 DB16-20 methodology against 170 DB16-20 methodology in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 189 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Ethiopia or Zimbabwe?
- Ethiopia, at 175 DB16-20 methodology against 170 DB16-20 methodology in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Ethiopia and Zimbabwe?
- 5 DB16-20 methodology, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Ethiopia ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.