Equatorial Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)

Equatorial Guinea
85 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
80 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
95th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 85 DB16-20 methodology against 80 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 5 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 95th of 189 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Equatorial Guinea or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Equatorial Guinea, at 85 DB16-20 methodology against 80 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Equatorial Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
5 DB16-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 95th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Equatorial Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 1,132 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.