Croatia vs Korea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Croatia
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 11.1 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Croatia, a difference of 11.1 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 169th and Korea ranks 167th of 188 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Croatia or Korea?
- Korea, at 11.1 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Croatia and Korea?
- 11.1 DB16-20 methodology, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Korea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Croatia ranks 169th and Korea ranks 167th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.