Comoros vs Paraguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Comoros
- Paraguay
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 124 DB16-20 methodology against 120 DB16-20 methodology in Paraguay, a difference of 4 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 61st and Paraguay ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Comoros or Paraguay?
- Comoros, at 124 DB16-20 methodology against 120 DB16-20 methodology in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Comoros and Paraguay?
- 4 DB16-20 methodology, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Paraguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Comoros ranks 61st and Paraguay ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.