China (People’s Republic of) vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)

China (People’s Republic of)
73.57 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
75 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
106th
Papua New Guinea rank
103rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Papua New Guinea
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 75 DB16-20 methodology against 73.57 DB16-20 methodology in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 1.43 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China (People’s Republic of) ahead.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 106th and Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 188 countries.

China (People’s Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), China (People’s Republic of) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 75 DB16-20 methodology against 73.57 DB16-20 methodology in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Papua New Guinea?
1.43 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Papua New Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 106th and Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/china/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/china/papua-new-guinea/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.