China vs Finland: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- China
- Finland
How they compare
China currently reports 73.57 DB16-20 methodology against 70 DB16-20 methodology in Finland, a difference of 3.57 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 105th and Finland ranks 107th of 186 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), China or Finland?
- China, at 73.57 DB16-20 methodology against 70 DB16-20 methodology in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between China and Finland?
- 3.57 DB16-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Finland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Finland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- China ranks 105th and Finland ranks 107th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.