Central African Republic vs Mexico: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Central African Republic
- Mexico
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 60 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Mexico, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 114th and Mexico ranks 114th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Central African Republic or Mexico?
- Central African Republic, at 60 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Central African Republic and Mexico?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mexico?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Mexico rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Central African Republic ranks 114th and Mexico ranks 114th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.