Cameroon vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Cameroon
- Tanzania
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 305.5 DB16-20 methodology against 275 DB16-20 methodology in Tanzania, a difference of 30.5 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Cameroon or Tanzania?
- Cameroon, at 305.5 DB16-20 methodology against 275 DB16-20 methodology in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Cameroon and Tanzania?
- 30.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Tanzania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Cameroon ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.