Australia vs Solomon Islands: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Australia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Australia currently reports 264 DB16-20 methodology against 257 DB16-20 methodology in Solomon Islands, a difference of 7 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 19th and Solomon Islands ranks 20th of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Australia or Solomon Islands?
- Australia, at 264 DB16-20 methodology against 257 DB16-20 methodology in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Australia and Solomon Islands?
- 7 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Solomon Islands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Australia ranks 19th and Solomon Islands ranks 20th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.