Armenia vs Guatemala: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Armenia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 105 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in Armenia, a difference of 5 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Armenia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 105 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Armenia and Guatemala?
- 5 DB16-20 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Guatemala?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Guatemala rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Armenia ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.