Algeria vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Algeria
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 427.5 DB16-20 methodology against 374.44 DB16-20 methodology in Algeria, a difference of 53.06 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Algeria or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 427.5 DB16-20 methodology against 374.44 DB16-20 methodology in Algeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Algeria and Sudan?
- 53.06 DB16-20 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Algeria and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Algeria ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 5th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to export records the cost associated with compliance with the export documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in UD dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.