Togo vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Togo
93.75
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
93.75
in 2019
Togo rank
27th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
27th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Togo
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Togo currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Togo ranks 27th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 27th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Togo or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Togo, at 93.75 against 93.75 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Togo and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Togo and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Togo ranks 27th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 27th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.