Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uzbekistan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 31.25 against 27 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 4.25.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 172nd and Uzbekistan ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Tanzania, United Republic of or Uzbekistan?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 31.25 against 27 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Tanzania, United Republic of and Uzbekistan?
- 4.25, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Uzbekistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 172nd and Uzbekistan ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.