Solomon Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Solomon Islands
35.75
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
37.5
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
170th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
168th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 37.5 against 35.75 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 1.75.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 170th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 168th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Solomon Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 37.5 against 35.75 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.75, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 170th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 168th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.