Solomon Islands vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 35.75 against 31.25 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 4.5.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 169th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 171st of 190 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Solomon Islands or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Solomon Islands, at 35.75 against 31.25 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Solomon Islands and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 4.5, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 169th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 171st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.