Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
77
in 2019
Senegal
76
in 2019
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
102nd
Senegal rank
105th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
- Senegal
How they compare
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of currently reports 77 against 76 in Senegal, a difference of 1.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 102nd and Senegal ranks 105th of 190 countries.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Mauritania, Islamic Republic of or Senegal?
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, at 77 against 76 in Senegal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Senegal?
- 1, with Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Senegal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 102nd and Senegal ranks 105th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.