Kuwait vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Kuwait
43.25
in 2019
Sierra Leone
43.21
in 2019
Kuwait rank
160th
Sierra Leone rank
161st

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Kuwait
  • Sierra Leone
010203040201420162019

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 43.25 against 43.21 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.04.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 160th and Sierra Leone ranks 161st of 188 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Kuwait or Sierra Leone?
Kuwait, at 43.25 against 43.21 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Kuwait and Sierra Leone?
0.04, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Sierra Leone?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Kuwait ranks 160th and Sierra Leone ranks 161st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.