Republic of Korea vs Marshall Islands: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Republic of Korea
97.23
in 2019
Marshall Islands
95
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
22nd
Marshall Islands rank
25th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 97.23 against 95 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 2.23.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 22nd and Marshall Islands ranks 25th of 190 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Republic of Korea or Marshall Islands?
- Republic of Korea, at 97.23 against 95 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Republic of Korea and Marshall Islands?
- 2.23, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Marshall Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Marshall Islands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 22nd and Marshall Islands ranks 25th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.