Iran, Islamic Republic of vs United States of America: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
85
in 2019
United States of America
85
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
66th
United States of America rank
66th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- United States of America
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 85 against 85 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 66th and United States of America ranks 66th of 190 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Iran, Islamic Republic of or United States of America?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 85 against 85 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and United States of America?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and United States of America?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and United States of America rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 66th and United States of America ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.