Guatemala vs Oman: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Guatemala
73.75
in 2019
Oman
73.21
in 2019
Guatemala rank
115th
Oman rank
116th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Guatemala
  • Oman
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 73.75 against 73.21 in Oman, a difference of 0.54.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 115th and Oman ranks 116th of 188 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Guatemala or Oman?
Guatemala, at 73.75 against 73.21 in Oman as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Guatemala and Oman?
0.54, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Oman?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Oman rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Guatemala ranks 115th and Oman ranks 116th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.