Eswatini vs Fiji: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Eswatini
81.11
in 2019
Fiji
81
in 2019
Eswatini rank
86th
Fiji rank
87th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Eswatini
  • Fiji
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 81.11 against 81 in Fiji, a difference of 0.11.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 86th and Fiji ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Eswatini or Fiji?
Eswatini, at 81.11 against 81 in Fiji as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Eswatini and Fiji?
0.11, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Fiji?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Fiji rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Eswatini ranks 86th and Fiji ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.