Côte d'Ivoire vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Côte d'Ivoire
65.97
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
65
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
134th
United Arab Emirates rank
137th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 65.97 against 65 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.97.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 134th and United Arab Emirates ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Côte d'Ivoire or United Arab Emirates?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 65.97 against 65 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Côte d'Ivoire and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.97, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 134th and United Arab Emirates ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.