Congo vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Congo
58.75
in 2019
Zimbabwe
57.5
in 2019
Congo rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
144th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 58.75 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.25.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 144th of 188 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 58.75 against 57.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Congo and Zimbabwe?
1.25, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Congo ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 144th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.