Democratic Republic of Congo vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2019
Namibia
13.12
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
181st
Namibia rank
178th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Namibia
051015201420162019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 13.12 against 0 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 13.12.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 181st and Namibia ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Democratic Republic of Congo or Namibia?
Namibia, at 13.12 against 0 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Democratic Republic of Congo and Namibia?
13.12, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 181st and Namibia ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.